Young, Colleagues Ask EPA to Appeal Arizona Dicamba Decision
WASHINGTON, D.C. — U.S. Senator Todd Young (R-Ind.) joined Senator Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) and a group of senators in sending a letter to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) calling for the Biden Administration to appeal an adverse court decision to protect farmers from losing certain dicamba-based crop protection tools largely used in no-till farming.
The U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona released a decision to vacate certain Dicamba registrations at a time when farmers have already made planting decisions for the spring. The letter asks the EPA to not only appeal the decision but also to seek a stay pending the appeal. It also asks them to modify its current existing stocks order so farmers, retailers, and manufacturers won’t be impacted this spring.
“U.S. farmers are already coping with record input costs, crippling interest rates, and lackluster commodity prices. USDA is forecasting a major decline in 2024 farm income as well as a record agricultural trade deficit. The last thing farmers need now is to lose access to critical crop protection tools in which they have already invested thousands of dollars and on which they have based this year’s planting decisions. Crop protection tools like dicamba are vital to making no-till farming practical and efficient at a commercial level. If these tools are not available, farmers will be forced to revert to full tillage methods, which would ultimately set yields and conservation efforts back decades,” the senators wrote.
In addition to Senators Young and Marshall, the letter was also signed by Senators Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-Miss.), Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), John Hoeven (R-N.D.), Pete Ricketts (R-Neb.), Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.), James Lankford (R-Okla.), Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.), Bill Hagerty (R-Tenn.), Katie Boyd Britt (R-Ala.), Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), Ted Budd (R-N.C.), Deb Fischer (R-Neb.), Mike Braun (R-Ind.), Ted Cruz (R-Texas), Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), and John Thune (R-S.D.).
The full letter can be found here and below.
February 15, 2024
The Honorable Michael S. Regan
Administrator
Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20460
Dear Administrator Regan,
We write today to urge you to respond to the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona’s decision to vacate certain Dicamba registrations by pursuing an appeal and seeking to stay the decision pending the appeal. Furthermore, while we certainly appreciate the existing stocks order you issued on February 14, however, we ask that you expand that order to include product within the possession of registrants that has been manufactured and ready for sale on the date of the decision to be distributed, sold, and used.
As you may be aware, farmers across the country have already made planting decisions on seed genetics and crop protection tools for their cotton and soybeans. In the South, some planting is imminent if not already underway. The decision out of Arizona comes at the worst possible time for farmers who are preparing to plant an estimated 50 million acres of soy and cotton using dicamba-tolerant seed. 45% of all soybean acres is also estimated to be dicamba-tolerant this year. The United States is one of the world’s leading soybean and cotton producers, a leading soybean exporter, and the leading cotton exporter. Needless to say, the impact of this decision can and will be felt globally.
While the existing stocks order helps, EPA can do more to alleviate the impact of this decision. Farmers should not have to make last minute decisions on genetics and crop protection products, which will in-turn put supply constraints on other technologies and dramatically drive up the input costs that are already drowning them. Quite frankly, there may not be enough alternative seed or chemistry in the marketplace to replace these tools. Given the immediacy of spring planting, there is no way our current supply chains could accommodate a shift of tens of millions of acres to alternative products in such a short timeframe. To lose meaningful use of these over-the-top dicamba products for the 2024 growing season means hundreds of thousands of farmers would likely go without seed or herbicide during spring planting, which would be devastating for the agricultural economy.
U.S. farmers are already coping with record input costs, crippling interest rates, and lackluster commodity prices. USDA is forecasting a major decline in 2024 farm income as well as a record agricultural trade deficit. The last thing farmers need now is to lose access to critical crop protection tools in which they have already invested thousands of dollars and on which they have based this year’s planting decisions. Crop protection tools like dicamba are vital to making notill farming practical and efficient at a commercial level. If these tools are not available, farmers will be forced to revert to full tillage methods, which would ultimately set yields and conservation efforts back decades.
Access to safe, effective crop protection tools is vital for allowing farmers to continue to efficiently and sustainably feed, clothe, and fuel the world. We respectfully ask for your prompt attention to this court decision so that farmers may continue to do so.
Sincerely,